Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Connaughton v. Mount Vernon City School District
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
BERNARD J. CONNAUGHTON
Defendant:
MOUNT VERNON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMAL DOGGETT, Principal of Rebecca Turner Elementary School, THRUSHA HENDERSON, Assistant Principal of Rebecca Turner Elementary School and others
Muzumala v. City of New York
as 24-806
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRONXWORKS, PROJECT RENEWAL and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-238
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Williams v. Harry's Nurses Registry, Inc.
as 24-34
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLAUDIA WILLIAMS and Claudia Gayle
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRY'S NURSES REGISTRY, INC. and HARRY DORVILIER
Lin v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09002
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lin
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
O'Dell v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08707
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Gayle Sawyers v. Wellington et al
as 7:2022cv07153
Petitioner:
Le-Mayne De-Niro Gayle Sawyers
Respondent:
Fitzroy Alexander Wellington and Deneese Wellington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Coffman v. Zendesk, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07047
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Zendesk, Inc., Mikkel Svane, Archana Agrawal and others
Ciccotelli v. Zendesk, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06654
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
Zendesk, Inc., Archana Agrawal, Carl Bass and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
