Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-30
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
SPENCER JACKSON, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MICHAEL VATTIATO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and EDDIE FIELDS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CARL KOENIGSMANN, MD, JOHN MORLEY, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CAROL MOORES, DR.
Rosa v. Cook
as 23-8026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, sued in monetary damages through their individual capacities and in injunctive relief through their official capacities, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, sued in monetary damages through their individual capacities and in injunctive relief through their official capacities, BARONE, Warden, sued in monetary damages through their individual capacities and in injunctive relief through their official capacities and others
Shahidi v. Robinette et al
as 1:2022cv06075
Plaintiff:
Leila Ghavami Shahidi
Defendant:
Sue Robinette, Nitin Karnik, Monarch Financial Institute M.F.I Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Black v. Ganieva
as 22-1524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leon D. Black
Defendant / Appellee:
Guzel Ganieva, Wigdor LLP., Josh Harris and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-3
Black v. Ganieva et al
as 1:2021cv08824
Plaintiff:
Leon D. Black
Defendant:
Guzel Ganieva, Wigdor LLP., John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 21-1664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant / Appellee:
Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Brian S. Fischer, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, ADA Perez, Warden, Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Torres v. NYC Police Department
as 21-1313
Defendant:
Gianella Robalino, individually and as Paramedic, Michael Traverso, individually and as NYPD Police Officer, John Doe, #1, individually and as MD at Health & Hospitals Corp.(Bellevue Hospital) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Firefighter John Pepe, Officer Kevin Wahlight, Lieutenant James Scordus and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wilfredo Torres
In Re: Wilfredo Torres
as 21-224
Respondent:
John Doe, #1, individually and as MD at Health & Hospitals Corp. (Bellevue Hospital), Gianella Robalino, individually and as Paramedic, Ziijo Drogalic, individually and as employee of Bellevue South Associates(BSA) and others
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Torres
Vasquez v. The County of Rockland
as 20-3684
Defendant / Appellee:
Correction Officer John Kezek, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer employed by the County of Rockland, Correction Officer Paul Orbacz, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer employed by the County of Rockland, Sergeant Karl Mueller, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer employed by the County of Rockland and others
Defendant:
Correction Officers John Does, 1-3, in their individual and official capacities as Correction Officers
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kim Vasquez
Henry v. County of Nassau
as 20-1027
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Nassau, Jeffrey Toscano, Deputy Sheriff, Nassau County Police Department and others
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-3, said names being fictitious, but intended to designate certain unknown employees of the County of Nassau in the Pistol License Section of the Nassau County Police Department and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lambert Henry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
