Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Chrysafis v. Marks
as 22-3
Plaintiff:
Brandie LaCasse, Housing Court Answers, Make the Road New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pantelis Chrysafis, Mudan Shi, Feng Zhou and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts of New York State
Defendant:
Adrian H. Anderson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Dutchess County, New York, James Dzurenda, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, New York, Joseph Fucito, in his official capacity as Sheriff of New York City, New York and others
Grafton v. Dzurenda
as 21-1724
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kenneth Grafton
Respondent / Appellee:
James Dzurenda, Sheriff of the County of Nassau and The Attorney General of New York State
Chrysafis v. Marks
as 21-1493
Defendant / Appellee:
Margaret Garnett, in her official capacity as Commissioner of New York City Department of Investigation, James Dzurenda, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, New York, Adrian H. Anderson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Dutchess County, New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pantelis Chrysafis, Mudan Shi, Feng Zhou and others
Plaintiff:
Make the Road New York
Petitioner:
Housing Court Answers
Chrysafis et al v. Marks et al
as 2:2021cv02516
Defendant:
Caroline Tang-Alejandro, Joseph Fucito, Lawrence K. Marks and others
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Cohen, Feng Zhou, Rent Stabilization Association of NYC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Dzurenda
as 12-4979
Petitioner:
Anthony Carter
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, Warden and Theresa Lantz, Commissioner
Carter v. Dzurenda
as 12-4102
Petitioner:
Anthony Carter
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, Warden and Theresa Lantz, Commissioner
Meikle v. Dzurenda
as 11-3189
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clyde Meikle
Respondent - Appellee:
James Dzurenda
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
