Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Green Technology Lighting Corp v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corp
as 20-1690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Green Technology Lighting Corp., a Georgia Corporation
Defendant:
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Quaco v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters
as 19-2780
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Quaco
Defendant / Appellant:
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc.
Underwriting Members of Lloyd v. Al Rajhi Bank
as 18-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 2, Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 53, Underwriting of Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 55 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Al Rajhi Bank, National Commercial Bank and Saudi Binladin Group
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Morelli et al
as 1:2017mc00223
Petitioner:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Respondent:
Benedict P Morelli and Michael K. Rozen
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
The Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 53 et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al.
as 1:2017cv02129
Plaintiff:
The Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 53 , The Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 55 , The Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 205 and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Morelli et al
as 1:2016mc00425
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Defendant:
Benedict P Morelli, Michael K. Rozen, Edward Walpole and others
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2 et al v. AL RAJHI BANK et al
as 1:2016cv07853
Plaintiff:
UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2 , UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 53 , UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 55 and others
Defendant:
Al Rajhi Bank , National Commercial Bank and Saudi Binladin Group
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
In Re: September 11
as 13-3619
Plaintiff:
World Trade Farmers Market, Incorporated, Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
World Trade Center Properties LLC, 2 World Trade Center LLC, 4 World Trade Center LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Lauren Peters
Claimant:
Ellen Mariani, Ellen Mariani and Ellen Mariani
Defendant:
Burns International Services Corporation, Burns International Security Services Corporation, Emery Roth & Partners L.L.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American Airlines, Incorporated, Huntleigh USA Corporation, Huntleigh USA Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
World Trade Center Properties LLC and World Trade Center Properties LLC
In Re: September 11
as 13-3782
Plaintiff:
World Trade Farmers Market, Incorporated, Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
1 World Trade Center LLC, 3 World Trade Center LLC, 7 World Trade Company, L.P. and others
Claimant:
Ellen Mariani, Ellen Mariani and Ellen Mariani
Defendant:
Emery Roth & Partners L.L.C., Emery Roth & Sons, P.C., Globe Airport Security Services, Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American Airlines, Incorporated, Huntleigh USA Corporation, Huntleigh USA Corporation and others
In Re: September 11 Litigation
as 13-3619
Plaintiff:
World Trade Farmers Market, Incorporated, Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
World Trade Center Properties LLC, 2 World Trade Center LLC and 4 World Trade Center LLC
Claimant:
Ellen Mariani
Defendant / Appellee:
Huntleigh USA Corporation, UAL Corporation, Massachusetts Port Authority and others
Defendant:
Burns International Security Services Corporation, Emery Roth & Sons, P.C., Globe Airport Security Services, Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
