Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Roe v. City of New York
as 21-2437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Roe, Jane Roe and Jane Roe 1
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his individual and official capacity as District Attorney of the New York County District Attorney's Office, et al., NYPD and others
Kupfer v. Residential Mortgage Solution
as 21-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Betty Ann Kupfer, AKA Betty Kupfer and Charles Kupfer
Defendant / Appellee:
Servis One Inc., DBA BSI Financial Services, Jack Getzelman, individually and as Chief Financial Officer of Residential Mortgage Solution LLC and as Director / Officer of RMS Asset Management LLC, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC and others
Defendant:
Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates PC and Mark Antos, Esq., individually and as an associate of Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates PC
Vaughn v. Phoenix House Programs of New
as 19-517
Defendant:
Brendon L. Hoffman, President, Phoenix House Programs of New York, Arthur Wallace, Substance Abuse Counselor, Herman Lazada, Managing Director, Phoenix House Career Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Vaughn
Defendant / Appellee:
Phoenix House New York Inc. and Phoenix House
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
