Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nastasi & Associates, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P.
as 24-545
Plaintiff:
NASTASI & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
BLOOMBERG, L.P., TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, EUROTECH CONSTRUCTION CORP. and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-238
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Moore v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08718
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
Driver v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08465
Plaintiff:
David Driver
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
Wang v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08379
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
O'Dell v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08268
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
Daniels v. 25 Lafayette Investors, LLC
as 23-1105
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marilyn Daniels, AKA Marilyn Foster-Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Foster, AKA Marilyn Foster, AKA Marilyn Daniels-EL and Kenneth Daniels, AKA Kenneth Daniels-El
Respondent / Appellee:
25 Lafayette Investors, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
