Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Medina-Sarango v. Garland
as 24-1441
Petitioner:
NUSTA ROCIO MEDINA-SARANGO and NASLY CAMILA MEDINA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Berganza (Paredes-Cordova)
as 24-1365
Defendant:
ISAIAS TURCIOS, HORACIO GABRIEL BOTERO, OTONIEL TURCIOS-MARROQUIN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vasquez v. City of Yonkers
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
GISSELLE VASQUEZ
Defendant:
YONKERS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, Dr. EDWIN M. QUEZADA, in his personal capacity, in his professional capacity, CITY OF YONKERS and others
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burns v. Long
as 24-77
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE BURNS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY PAT LONG, ADA MEDINA, DEENA DENNLEY and others
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Medina-Cordero v. Garland
as 22-6258
Petitioner:
ANTHONY OMAR MEDINA-CORDERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rooney et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11970
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Sorresse, Sr., Kim Scheffold Stiefel, Layla Shajahan and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
United States of America v. Agosto (Griem)
as 23-6064
Defendant:
VICTOR AGOSTO, PERFECTO DELEON, LUIS LOPEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TYQUAN GRIEM and Ty Goon
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marquez Martinez v. Garland
as 22-6117
Petitioner:
ENA MARITZA MARQUEZ MARTINEZ, FRANKLIN JAVIER MEDINA MARQUEZ and DANIEL ALEXANDER ROMERO MARQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
