Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07647
Plaintiff: Mullen Automotive, Inc. and Ulysses Novoa
Defendant: TD Ameritrade, Inc., Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVCIES, LLC and others
Elnenaey v. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06970
Plaintiff: Elsayed A. Elnenaey
Defendant: Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, National Financial Services, LLC, Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Oriska Corporation v. Hodge
as 21-1556
Defendant: Mr. Benjamin Landa, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Steven Topal and others
Defendant / Appellant: Alexi Arias, Annettte Hall, Karen Grant Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivately to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Oriska Corporation v. Avalon Gardens Rehabilitation
as 21-1559
Defendant: Grandview Brokerage, Inc., Broad Coverage Services, Inc., Israel Ziegelman and others
Defendant / Appellant: Annette Hall, Alexi Arias, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Karen Grant Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Oriska Corporation v. Woodmere Rehabilitation and He
as 21-1560
Defendant: Grandview Brokerage, Inc., John Doe, Broad Coverage Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant: Annette Hall, Alexi Arias, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Karen Grant Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation
as 1:2011md02296
Defendant: LOEB ARBITRAGE FUND INVESTMENT A/C UNDER SEC 1236 & 475 OF I R C, Robert Chase, STANLEY G. HARRIS, STANLEY G. HARRIS TRUST and others
Not Yet Classified: HENRY CARSON JACKSON TRUST U/W IRREVOCABLE MANAGEMENT TRUST UA TRUST A-2, New England Province Society of Jesus, The Betty H. Roeland Marital Trust and others
Plaintiff: Patricia W Bernhardt, Gary K. Shorts, John M. Dyer and others
Consolidated Defendant: The Rosalie B. Schindel 2005 Trust U/A, STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420, The Erwin Shakin Delta Trust U/A and others
Claimant: United Methodist Church Benefit Board, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Joan I. Berger
Trustee: Donald M Ullman
Interested Party: Citadel Equity Fund Ltd., Camden Asset Management LP, and Certain of their Affiliates, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), Barbara Anne Ward Living Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Deutsch v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LL
as 18-1896
Petitioner - Appellant: Peter E. Deutsch and William J. Deutsch
Respondent - Appellee: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and National Financial Services LLC
Defendant: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., ("FINRA")
Fidelity Brokerage Services LL v. Deutsch
as 18-1774
Petitioner - Appellee: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and National Financial Services LLC
Respondent - Appellant: Peter E. Deutsch and William J. Deutsch
Defendant: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., (FINRA)
Deutsch et al v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08866
Petitioner: Peter E. Deutsch and William J. Deutsch
Respondent: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and National Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC et al v. Deutsch et al
as 1:2017cv05778
Petitioner: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and National Financial Services LLC
Respondent: Peter E. Deutsch and William J. Deutsch
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?