Cases 1 - 10 of 21
O'Diah v. United States Small Business Administration
as 22-1346
Petitioner:
Aror-Ark Ark O'Diah, c/o Timespeed Worldwide Global Judical Watch Moral Health Service Systems, Inc.
Respondent:
United States Small Business Administration, AKA SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator (in their Individual and Official Capacities), Beth Goldberg, SBA New York District Office Director (in their Individual and Official Capacities) and others
Santos-Torres v. Houghton
as 22-297
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandro Yobani Santos-Torres
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy J. Houghton, in his official capacity, District Director, New York District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Tracy Renaud, in his official capacity, Senior Official peforming the duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Mendoza v. USCIS
as 1:2021cv09296
Plaintiff:
Jesus Mendoza
Defendant:
USCIS New York District Office and USCIS
Azatullah v. Wolf et al.
as 1:2020cv01069
Defendant:
Lee F Bowes, Acting Director of the New York District of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad W Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II, Acting Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Seir Azatullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Puma Bravo v. McAleenan
as 19-953
Defendant / Appellee:
Mary Beth Keller, Chief immigration Judge Executive Office of Immigrartion Review, Frank James Loprest, Jr., Chief Immigration Judge, New York District, Executive Office of Immigration Review, New York NY, L. Francis Cissna, Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moises Guerrero Ramos, and their 3 USC children, Sherlyn Ivonne Puma Duran, by her mother and Guardian Ana Cecilia Duran Guaman, Nicole Cecilia Puma Duran, by her mother and Guardian, Ana Cecilia Duran Guaman and others
The City Club of New York v. United States Army Corps of En
as 17-1657
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The City Club of New York, Robert Buchanan and Tom Fox
Defendant:
Hudson River Park Trust, United States Army Corps of Engineers and Col. David A. Caldwell, in his official capacity as District Engineer of the New York District of United States Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant - Appellant:
Pier 55, Inc.
The City Club of New York v. United States Army Corps of En
as 17-1649
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The City Club of New York, Robert Buchanan and Tom Fox
Defendant:
Pier 55, Inc., United States Army Corps of Engineers and Col. David A. Caldwell, in his official capacity as District Engineer of the New York District of United States Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant - Appellant:
Hudson River Park Trust
The City Club of New York v. United States Army Corps of En
as 17-1647
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The City Club of New York, Robert Buchanan and Tom Fox
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Col. David A. Caldwell, in his official capacity as District Engineer of the New York District of United States Army Corps of Engineers, Hudson River Park Trust and others
Chen v. Secretary of Homeland Security et al.
as 1:2017cv00644
Defendant:
United States Attorney General , Director of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services , Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Changgeng Chen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Padhy v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2016cv05040
Defendant:
Director of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, New York District Director, Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Chandrajeet Padhy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
