Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shatsky v. The Palestine Liberation Organization
as 22-1138
Plaintiff:
Shabtai Scott Shatsky, Individually, Jo Anne Shatsky, Individually, Tzippora Shatsky Schwarz and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority, AKA Palestinian Interim Self-Government, AKA Palestinian National Authority
Intervenor:
United States of America, Miriam Fuld, individually, as personal representative and administrator of the Estate of Ari Yoel Fuld, deceased, and as natural guardian of plaintiff Natan Shai Fuld, Natan Shai Fuld, minor, by his next friend and guardian Miriam Fuld and others
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organizat
as 22-1060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Norman Gritz, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of David Gritz, Mark I. Sokolow, individually and as a natural guardian of Plaintiff Jamie A. Sokolow, Rena M. Sokolow, individually and as a natural guardian of plaintiff Jaime A. Sokolow and others
Defendant:
Yasser Arafat, Palestine Liberation Organization, Marwin Bin Khatib Barghouti and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Shatsky v. The Palestine Liberation Organ
as 22-791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shabtai Scott Shatsky, Individually, Jo Anne Shatsky, Individually, Tzippora Shatsky Schwarz and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority, AKA Palestinian Interim Self-Government, AKA Palestinian National Authority
Intervenor:
Miriam Fuld, individually, as personal representative and administrator of the Estate of Ari Yoel Fuld, deceased, and as natural guardian of plaintiff Natan Shai Fuld, Natan Shai Fuld, minor, by his next friend and guardian Miriam Fuld, Naomi Fuld and others
Shatsky et al v. The Palestine Liberation Organization et al
as 1:2018cv12355
Plaintiff:
HADASSA DINER, MIRIAM SHATSKY, JO ANNE SHATSKY and others
Defendant:
THE PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION, THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, The Palestinian National Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organizat
as 15-3135
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Eva Waldman, Revital Bauer, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs Yehonathon Bauer, Binyamin Bauer, Daniel Bauer and Yehuda Bauer, Shaul Mandelkorn and others
Defendant:
Yasser Arafat, Marwin Bin Khatib Barghouti, Ahmed Taleb Mustapha Barghouti, AKA Al-Faransi and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority, AKA Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority and or Palestinian Council and or Palestinian National Authority
Movant:
Charles Blau, Michael R. Bromwich, Rudolph Giuliani and others
Estates of Yaron Ungar et al v. Palestinian Authority et al
as 1:2010mc00607
Defendant:
Jamal Abdel Fatah Tzabich Al Hor, Amin Al-Hindi, Yasser Arafat and others
Plaintiff:
Michal Cohen, Judith Dasberg, Rabbi Uri Dasberg and others
Estate of Yaron Ungar v. Palestinian Authority et al
as 1:2010mc00593
Plaintiff:
Estate of Yaron Ungar
Movant:
Mark David McPherson and Morrison & Foerster LLP
Defendant:
Palestine Liberation Organization, Palestinian Authority and Palestinian Pension Fund for the State Administrative Employees in the Gaza Strip
Saperstein et al v. Palestinian Authority et al
as 1:2009mc00247
Plaintiff:
Moshe Saperstein, Rachel Saperstein, Avi Itzhak Saperstein and others
Defendant:
Palestinian Authority, Palestine Liberation Organization, Palestinian Preventative Security Services and others
Knox et al v. Palestine Liberation Organization
as 1:2007mc00157
Plaintiff:
Leslye Knox, Estate of Aharon Ellis, Jordan Terrell Ellis and others
Defendant:
Palestine Liberation Organization
Sokolow et al v. Palestine Liberation Organization et al
as 1:2004cv00397
Plaintiff:
Mark I. Sokolow, Mark I. Sokolow, Rena M. Sokolow and others
Defendant:
Palestine Liberation Organization, Palestine Liberation Organization, Palestinian Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
