Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2020mc00307
Petitioner:
Federal Trade Commission and People Of The State Of New York, By Letitia James
Respondent:
Quincy Bioscience Manufacturing, LLC, Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Mark Underwood and others
Interested Party:
Georgetown Economic Services, LLC
Karathanos v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08023
Defendant:
Michael Beaman, Quincy Bioscience Manufacturing, LLC, Prevagen, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Karathanos
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Federal Trade Commission v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Comp
as 17-3791
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Plaintiff - Appellant:
People of the State of New York, by Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant - Appellee:
Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., a corporation, Quincy Bioscience, LLC, a limited liability company, Prevagen, Inc., a corporation, DBA Sugar River Supplements and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Comp
as 17-3745
Plaintiff:
People of the State of New York, by Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General of the State of New York
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant - Appellee:
Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., a corporation, Quincy Bioscience, LLC, a limited liability company, Prevagen, Inc., a corporation, DBA Sugar River Supplements and others
Karathanos v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01091
Defendant:
Michael Beaman, Prevagen, Inc., Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Karathanos
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and People of The State of New York
Defendant:
Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Prevagen, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
