Cases 1 - 10 of 325
Elberus v. Garland
as 24-1442
Petitioner:
JEAN MICHEL ELBERUS, ROSE LAURE ELBERUS ALEXANDRE, LAURIE CHRISTIE ELBERUS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Buczek v. Seterus, LLC
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. BUCZEK
Defendant:
SETERUS, LLC, sometimes also assuming the alias of PHH Mortgage, JOHN DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants, JANE DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Gervat v. Freda et al
as 1:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Fabrizio Freda, Ronald S. Lauder, Leonard A. Lauder and others
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Harris v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Tracy Harris
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
