Cases 1 - 10 of 64
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whitehead v. Ready Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Emily Whitehead
Defendant:
Ready Capital Corporation, Thomas E. Capasse, Jack J. Ross and others
United States of America v. Major
as 23-6187
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL FOSTER, CHARLIE JIMINEZ, TORREL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CRAIG MAJOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Green (Reese)
as 22-2628
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nefateemia Massey and William N. Green
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher E. Reese
United States of America v. Green (Reese)
as 22-2184
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nefateemia Massey and William N. Green
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher E. Reese
Johnson v. NICS
as 22-1485
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
NICS, CJIS, Buffalo Police Department and others
Gottfried v. Ready Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Adam Gottfried
Defendant:
Ready Capital Corporation, Thomas Edward Capasse, Jack Jay Ross and others
United States of America v. Raysor (Ronald Stanley)
as 21-1053
Defendant:
Gerald Lewis, AKA Bay, Cleveland Whorley, AKA Clee, AKA Cleve, Wayne Stinson and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Stanley, AKA R.A.W.
Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany
as 21-905
Defendant / Appellee:
MaryAnne Gimartin, James E. Jordan, Jacob M. Katz and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stanley Rubenstein, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant JEFFERIES FINANCIAL GROUP INC.,
Defendant:
DEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
