Cases 1 - 10 of 46
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Xu v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2022cv05090
Plaintiff:
Lee Xu, Stephen M Szymanski, ROBERT K. WOLVINGTON and others
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Rafferty Asset Management, LLC, Direxion Family of Investment Companies and others
Thompson v. Verso Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Verso Corporation, Randy J. Nebel, Jeffrey E. Kirt and others
Collins v. Verso Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Thomas Collins
Defendant:
Verso Corporation, Robert K. Beckler, Marvin Cooper and others
Trinh v. Verso Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Jade Trinh
Defendant:
Verso Corporation, Dr. Robert K. Beckler, Randy J. Nebel and others
Whitfield v. Verso Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Verso Corp., Robert K. Beckler, Marvin Cooper and others
O'Dell v. Verso Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Verso Corporation, Randy J. Nebel, Marvin Cooper and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dr. Robert K. Beckler
Kohler v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10338
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kohler
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Clay M. Gaspar, Richard E. Muncrief and others
Bushansky v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09873
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Clay M. Gaspar, Richard E. Muncrief and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Westmoreland v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09799
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Clay M. Gaspar, Richard E. Muncrief and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Westmoreland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
