Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Shelton v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2024cv02581
Plaintiff:
James E. Shelton
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shelton v. Heavy Fluce Inc.
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
James E. Shelton
Defendant:
Heavy Fluce Inc. doing business as Fluce AI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Primus v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Primus
Defendant:
Jackie Shelton, United States Post Office and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shelton v. RPA Energy Inc.
as 1:2020cv05205
Plaintiff:
James Everett Shelton
Defendant:
RPA Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Randle, et al v. AC Asset Services LLC
as 1:2019cv01074
Defendant:
AC Asset Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Tilda Shelton and Cory Randle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shelton v. Lumico Life Insurance Company et al
as 7:2019cv06494
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company and Assurance IQ, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Everett Shelton
Gross v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Lewis Kramer, Vincent Pagano, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Raul v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Ann E. Dunwoody, Lewis Kramer and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Freeman et al v. HSBC Holdings PLC et al
as 1:2018cv07359
Defendant:
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited, HSBC Holdings PLC, HSBC Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marvise L. Crockett, Daniel Carvill, Kristin Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
