Cases 1 - 10 of 559
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Gomez (Ramos-Acevedo)
as 24-1336
Defendant:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ, RAMON RAMOS-ACEVEDO, Calami and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cheong v. The Bank of East Asia, Ltd.
as 24-1163
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHEONG
Defendant:
THE BANK OF EAST ASIA, LTD. and THE BANK OF EAST ASIA, LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Gomez
as 24-1122
Defendant:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ, Calami and C.
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Authors Guild v. OpenAI Inc.
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
AUTHORS GUILD, DAVID BALDACCI, NICHOLAS A. BASBANES and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., OPENAI LP and others
Not Yet Classified:
PAUL TREMBLAY, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
United States of America v. Orena
as 24-835
Defendant:
VICTOR J. ORENA, JOSEPH RUSSO, ANTHONY RUSSO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Escobar-Canessa
as 24-779
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VICTOR MANUEL ESCOBAR-CANESSA
Bellino v. Tallarico
as 24-763
Defendant:
STEVEN VICTOR TALLARICO and Steven Tyler
Plaintiff:
JEANNE BELLINO
Cayo-Pastuna v. Garland
as 23-8072
Petitioner:
ABDON VICTOR CAYO-PASTUNA, DIDIER ANTHONY CAYO-PILALUMBO and BEATRIZ ALEXANDRA PILALUMBO-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff:
TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
