Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Coburn et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04716
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Coburn and Janie Coburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sloma v. Long Island Railroad
as 1:2023cv10416
Plaintiff:
Robert C Sloma
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wirth v. Domerson
as 1:2022cv10809
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Wirth
Defendant:
Leones H. Domerson, Geico Advantage Insurance Company and Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Worth v. Domerson
as 1:2022cv10808
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Worth
Defendant:
Leones H. Domerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Pena v. Pham et al
as 1:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Pena
Defendant:
Bach Duong Pham and Vinh T. Phan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Lusk v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Lusk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Barber et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ronald William Lester, Eleanor Barber, Christian T. Hanover and others
Defendant:
Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation, Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Abernethy et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12309
Plaintiff:
Kristen Folberth, Christopher Gibbs, Melissa Lawson and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Abbas et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11527
Plaintiff:
John Bardak, Michael Santo, James Bevers and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Cronin v. Hahn
as 2:2018cv03003
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Cronin
Defendant:
Robert C Hahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
