Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dubose v. D'Emic et al
as 1:2018cv02169
Defendant:
Honorable Martin Murphy, Honorable Mathew D'Emic, Michelle Clifford and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrold Dubose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nicholas v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tedla Nicholas
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Avion Stinson
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubose v. D'Emic et al
as 1:2017cv06938
Defendant:
Hon Mathew D'Emic, Honorable Martin Murphy and Robert Peck
Plaintiff:
Jerrold Dubose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddy v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv08960
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. Dortch et al
as 1:2017cv07266
Plaintiff:
Erik White, Tamarsha Battice, Lanette Davis and others
Defendant:
Tamika Dortch, Kenneth M. Perry, Esq, George B. Lewis, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Murphy
as 1:2017cv05852
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Henry
Respondent:
Martin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henry v. Miccoli et al
as 1:2017cv04420
Defendant:
Joseph Freebern, Vincent Miccoli, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Murphy
as 1:2016cv05421
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Henry
Respondent:
Martin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vassallo v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv07125
Plaintiff:
Frank Vassallo
Defendant:
City of New York , Corizon Health, Inc. , Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
