Labor Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Vecchio v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
as 20-3571
Plaintiff: Crystal Rumph, Sierra Trimble, Danielle Chickos and others
Defendant / Appellee: ExamOne LLC, Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and ExamOne World Wide, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Maria Vecchio, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Sallenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavarro, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv05821
Defendant: John R. Lopresti, RoseMarie Lopresti and Sallenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavarro, LLP
Plaintiff: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Vecchio v. Quest Diagnostics Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05165
Plaintiff: Vecchio, Michelanne Shane, Kamika Johnson and others
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Inc, ExamOne LLC, Quest Diagnostics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chen et al v. Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01347
Defendant: Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC, Xpresspa Atlanta Terminal A, LLC, Xpressa Atlanta Terminal C, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Chen, Xiao Ling Chen, Zeng Biao Teng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quigley v. Citigroup Supplemental Plan Fo
as 12-613
Plaintiff: John L. Vessa
Plaintiff - Appellant: Daniel C. Quigley, William Hiden, Joseph F. Durso and others
Defendant - Appellee: Citigroup Supplemental Plan For Shearson Transfers and Plan Administration Committee of Citigroup Inc., As Plan Administrator
Quigley et al v. The Citigroup Supplemental Plan For Shearson Transfers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv08944
Plaintiff: Daniel C. Quigley, William Hiden, Joseph F. Durso and others
Defendant: The Citigroup Supplemental Plan For Shearson Transfers and The Plan Administration Committee of Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?