Cases 101 - 110 of 115
Yusov v. Shaughnessy et al
as 1:2009cv00056
Petitioner:
Yuri Yusov
Respondent:
James Shaughnessy, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dutton v. U.S. Attorney General
as 1:2008cv00874
Petitioner:
Shon C. Dutton
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General; Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Roach v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 2:2008cv01916
Petitioner:
Colin A. Roach
Respondent:
U.S Attorney General and Marc Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Monroe County Sherif's Dept. et al
as 6:2008cv06123
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
Monroe County Sherif's Dept., Monroe County District Attorney's Office and U.S. Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Iglesias v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2008cv00345
Plaintiff:
Erick Valle Iglesias
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10700
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
El Amin Shalaby v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2007cv09885
Petitioner:
Samer Mohamed El Amin Shalaby and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Office of US Attorney and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
