Cases 111 - 120 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Gamel v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv03276
Petitioner:
Gergis Gamel
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Andrea Qurantillo and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
El Baz v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv03275
Petitioner:
Tamer El Baz
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Andrea Qurantillo and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Huang et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 7:2007cv03247
Plaintiff:
Huashan Huang and Changhong Yin
Defendant:
Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khaliq v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01652
Plaintiff:
Madiha Khaliq
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nam v. Gonzales
as 1:2007cv01567
Plaintiff:
Gil Hyang Nam
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
