Cases 121 - 130 of 202
Benjamin et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Burr Benjamin and Sharon Benjamin
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04434
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dillard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04403
Plaintiff:
Audrea Dillard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Calahan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04364
Plaintiff:
Sharon Calahan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newton et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04366
Plaintiff:
John Newton and Joan Newton
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Markotsis et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04365
Plaintiff:
Frances Markotsis and James Markotsis
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01113
Plaintiff:
Mary Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Majors et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03851
Plaintiff:
Joyce Majors and Spencer Majors
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shapiro et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03849
Plaintiff:
Barry Shapiro and Marilyn Shapiro
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flatt et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03852
Plaintiff:
Harold Flatt and Terry Flatt
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
