Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Guerrero v. Decker
as 20-1532
Respondent:
Attorney William P. Barr, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Idalia Guerrero
Rodriguez Sanchez v. Decker
as 20-695
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Steven Ahrendt, in his official capacity as Warden and Officer in Charge of the Bergen County Jail and others
Petitioner:
Amado Rodriguez Sanchez
Aguirre v. Barr
as 20-51
Respondent:
Director Carl DuBois, Director of the Orange County Correctional Facility, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director James McHenry, Director, Executive Office of Immigration Review and others
Petitioner:
Efrain Fernandez Aguirre
Defendant / Appellant:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Mamadjonova v. Barr
as 19-3971
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United, Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Massachusetts Acting Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security, United States
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bakhodir Sabitovich Madjitov and Madina S. Mamadjonova
Gonzalez-Reyes v. Delmonte
as 19-2543
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Respondent / Appellee:
Todd Tryon, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Buffalo, New York Office, and Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Nunez v. Whaling
as 19-2114
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Edward Newman, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, Assistant Office-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility.
Petitioner / Appellant:
Luis Alberto Nunez
In Re: Luis Alberto Nunez
as 19-1802
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, Assistant Office-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Nunez
In Re: Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez
as 19-1808
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Todd Tryon, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Buffalo, New York Office, and Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Elaine Duke, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Fredric v. Edwards
as 19-1587
Not Yet Classified:
Alex Fredric, Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States and others
Brevil v. Jones
as 19-562
Undetermined:
Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Pelege Brevil, Kenneth T. Jones, Undersheriff Orange County Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
