Cases 11 - 20 of 708
Marek v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gary Marek
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Peterson v. Icosavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Peterson
Defendant:
Icosavax, Inc., Peter Kolchinsky, Heidi Kunz and others
Peterson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
LAURIE PETERSON
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Jenkins v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Lawrence v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Peterson v. Valnet Inc.
as 1:2023cv11246
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Defendant:
Valnet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
O'Guynn et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10700
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen O'Guynn, Neal Slocum, Ivan Hathaway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Peterson v. Mckenzie Liautaud LLC
as 1:2023cv09668
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Defendant:
Mckenzie Liautaud LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Finger v. Denbury Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08742
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Denbury Inc., Kevin Meyers, Anthony Abate and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
