Cases 21 - 30 of 16,911
Essa v. Slattery et al
as 1:2024cv03985
Defendant:
Phillip Slattery, Conrad Tribble, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
The People of the State of New York v. Arm or Ally, LLC
as 24-1497
Petitioner:
ARM OR ALLY, LLC, BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING GROUP, INC., AKA 80 PERCENT ARMS, INC., AKA 80 PERCENT ARMS, SALVO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.., AKA 80P BUILDER, AKA 80P FREEDOM CO. and others
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wimberly v. James
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
JASON WIMBERLY
Defendant:
LETITIA JAMES, In her capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York and ALVIN BRAGG, In his capacity as District Attorney of the County of New York
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Huang v. Garland
as 24-1474
Petitioner:
MIAOHUA HUANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Azamov v. Garland
as 24-1475
Petitioner:
FIRDAVS AZAMOV, NARGIZA RAUFOVA, RUKHSHONA DAVRONOVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anaya v. Garland
as 24-1457
Petitioner:
JUAN PABLO ANAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
