Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Deutsche Bank Americas Holding v. Moreno
as 17-2911
Petitioner: Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp., Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp. Executive Committee, Richard O'Connell and others
Respondent: Ramon Moreno, Individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons and on behalf of the Deutsche Bank Matched Savings Plan, Donald O'Halloran, Individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons and on behalf of the Deutsche Bank Matched Savings Plan, Omkharan Arasarantnam and others
Movant: United States Chamber of Commerce
Harkey v. General Electric Company
as 17-798
Plaintiff: Betty Harkey, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner: General Electric Company
Plaintiff - Respondent: Glen Grayson, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Doreen Mazzanti, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Daniel Levy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Movant: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, "AHAM" and National Association of Manufacturers, "NAM"
Greater Patchogue Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. Farmingdale Merchants Association, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05031
Defendant: John Doe, Farmingdale Chamber of Commerce, Inc., Farmingdale Merchants Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Greater Patchogue Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce et al v. United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce et al
as 1:2016cv06449
Plaintiff: Joe Muniz and New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
Defendant: United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Don Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia et al v. Vacca et al
as 1:2016cv06455
Defendant: Nina Vacca, Javier Palomarez and United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Plaintiff: Frank Garcia , Rev. Carmen Hernandez and New York city Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer Straight Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2752
Plaintiff: Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Ergo
Defendant / Appellant: Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2750
Plaintiff: Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Ergo
Defendant / Appellant: Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Strougo v. Barclays PLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1912
Plaintiff - Appellee: Joseph Waggoner, Mohit Sahni and Barbara Strougo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Chris Lucas, Tushar Morzaria and Bob Diamond
Defendant - Appellant: Barclays PLC, Robert Diamond, Antony Jenkins and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Paul A. Atkins, Elizabeth Cosenza and others
McDonnell v. Nelson et al
as 1:2016cv04482
Defendant: Justin G. Nelson , National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael McDonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonnell v. Nelson et al
as 1:2016cv04481
Defendant: Justin G. Nelson , National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael McDonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?