Cases 21 - 30 of 251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. Lofty Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10943
Counter Defendant:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
Lofty Trading, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Ben Chang Fan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Burton-Whitmore v. Riley et al
as 2:2022cv07780
Plaintiff:
Steven Burton-Whitmore
Defendant:
James Riley, Cristian Glover, Anthony Agate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Missfresh Limited et al
as 1:2022cv09836
Plaintiff:
Juan Chen, Maso Capital Investments Limited, Chelsea Fan and others
Petitioner:
Blackwell Partners LLC Series A, Star V Partners LLC, Bingzheng Mao and others
Defendant:
Missfresh Limited, Zheng Xu, Jun Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
