Cases 21 - 30 of 10,088
Vermont Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Birmingham
as 24-2026
Defendant:
CHARITY CLARK, Attorney General of the State of Vermont, in her official and personal capacities, SARAH GEORGE, State's Attorney for Chittenden County, in her official and personal capacities and MATTHEW BIRMINGHAM, Director of the Vermont State Police, in his official and personal capacities
Plaintiff:
MARSHA J. THOMPSON, VERMONT FEDERATION OF SPORTSMEN'S CLUBS, POWDERHORN OUTDOOR SPORTS CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05346
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gao v. Garland
as 24-2009
Petitioner:
GONG HUA GAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chima-Troya v. Garland
as 24-2002
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN CHIMA-TROYA
Parker v. New York State Division of Parole
as 24-1998
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE
Plaintiff:
GILBERT PARKER
Vargas Manzano v. Garland
as 24-1983
Petitioner:
NANCY OLIMPIA VARGAS MANZANO, ZURI AMARIS TUITISE VARGAS and EDISON FERNANDO TUITISE CUCHIPARTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hussan v. Garland
as 24-1985
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD MAHBUB HUSSAN
Castro-Almonte v. Garland
as 24-1968
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
LUIS DAVID CASTRO-ALMONTE
Canales-Canales v. Garland
as 24-1962
Petitioner:
YOSTIN DARIEL TURCIOS-CANALES and RUTH ELIZABETH CANALES-CANALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
