Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Zapotocky v. CIT Bank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv06377
Plaintiff:
Darren P. Zapotocky
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Fleming et al
as 1:2017cv04762
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Leroy Fleming, New York City Parking Violations Bureau, Emma Short and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2017cv04704
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Douglas Hawkins, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Municipal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2017cv04654
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Town Supervisor Town of Huntington and Jose M. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Boykin et al
as 7:2017cv05811
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
A. David Boykin, Tracey Boykin and Citibank South Dakota, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CIT Bank, N.A. v. De Los Santos
as 1:2017cv04045
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Iris De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
CIT Bank N.A. v. Gordon et al
as 2:2017cv03972
Defendant:
Latonji Bishop, Brookhaven Memorial Hospital, Andrea Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Artis et al
as 1:2017cv03787
Defendant:
Lorraine Artis, Michael Artis and GE Money Bank
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Gleixner et al
as 2:2017cv03760
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA, N.A., Rosanna M. Gleixner, L.I. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Anadaloro
as 1:2017cv03269
Defendant:
Adele Anadaloro
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
