Cases 31 - 40 of 515
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Birch v. Garland
as 23-6142
Petitioner:
CARDEL OBRIAN BIRCH, IMMIGRANT DEFENSE PROJECT and NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LITIGATION ALLIANCE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Premier Pool Renovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the Tile Layers Local Union 52 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Premier Pool Renovations, Inc. and Arben Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The New York Times Company et al v. Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Mark Walker
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Rabin et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Rabin, Catherine E. Ryan, Lisa R. Walker and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New York Times Company et al v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 1:2022cv10299
Plaintiff:
New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Immigrant Defense Project et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2022cv09920
Plaintiff:
Immigrant Defense Project and Center for Constitutional Rights
Defendant:
Director Customs and Border Protection, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Cordaro v. Department of Defense
as 6:2022cv06499
Plaintiff:
Michael Cordaro
Defendant:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Defense
as 1:2022cv09481
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Azmat Khan
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
