Cases 41 - 50 of 68
United States of America ex re v. Allergan, Inc.
as 17-2191
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Montana, District of Columbia and others
Defendant:
DEF and Allergan PLC
Defendant - Appellant:
Allergan Inc.
United States of America v. Amgen, Inc.
as 17-1522
Plaintiff:
United States of America, and the States of Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of California, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of Colorado, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D. and others
Appellant:
Daniel Coyne, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Amgen, Inc.
Rasvinder Dhaliwal v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
as 1:2015cv00706
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
The United States of America v. Walgreen Company
as 14-3392
Plaintiff:
ABC, The State of Maryland, The State of Minnesota and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fox Rx, Inc., ex rel.
Defendant:
DEF
Defendant - Appellee:
Walgreen Company
Fox Rx, Inc. v. Pharmerica Corp.
as 14-3501
Plaintiff:
ABC, State of North Carolina, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fox Rx, Inc., ex rel United States of America
Defendant:
DEF and MHA Long Term Care Network
Defendant - Appellee:
Pharmerica Corp., Neighborcare, Inc., Omnicare, Incorporated and others
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of New York, State of Texas, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
South Florida Water Management District
Defendant - Appellant:
Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-2003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of New York, State of Texas, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellant:
South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-2016
Plaintiff:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba, Canada
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, City of New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
