Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Chico-Meza v. Mussels & More, Ltd et al
as 1:2013cv00357
Defendant:
James Bantis and Mussels & More, Ltd
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Chico-Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chico-Meza v. Don Pancholo Rest Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Chico-Meza
Defendant:
Don Pancholo Rest Corp. and Luis Muniz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Cano et al v. BBQ Chicken Don Alex II, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04240
Plaintiff:
Claudia M. Abad, Natalia Andrea Cano and Andrea Meza
Defendant:
BBQ Chicken Don Alex II, Inc., BBQ Chicken Don Alex No. 6, LLC, Elmer Huaringa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Meza v. Baker et al
as 7:2012cv04430
Plaintiff:
Luis Meza
Defendant:
Mitchell J. Baker and Baker, Leshko, Saline & Blosser, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meza v. Calvi Supermarkert, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02784
Defendant:
Calvi Supermarkert, Inc. and Vito G. Chimienti
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Meza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hazen et al v. 621 Events LLC et al
as 1:2010cv07121
Plaintiff:
Sohail Zaman, Daniel Montenegro, Armando Acevedo and others
Defendant:
621 Events LLC, Sean McGarr and Michael Sinensky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Meza v. NYP Holdings, Inc., et al
as 7:2010cv06691
Plaintiff:
Luis Meza
Defendant:
NYP Holdings, Inc. and Frank X Cassese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Meza v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv07634
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Meza
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
