Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Sullivan et al v. Orba Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv02824
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute, Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Rikki Kumar and Orba Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. A&Z Construction Co. et al
as 1:2012cv02825
Defendant:
A&Z Construction Co., Arshad Hussain and John or Jane Doe Fiduciary
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Euro Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02501
Defendant:
Beys Specialty, Inc., Euro Construction Services, Inc., Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. M&S General Construction et al
as 1:2012cv02089
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, M&S General Construction, RLI Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. JK Merillin Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01918
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Hanover Insurance Company, JK Merillin Builders, Inc., John and or Jane Doe Fiduciary and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Mastercraft Masonry, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00462
Defendant:
Mastercraft Masonry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Masonry Institute, Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Annuity Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. R. Smith Restoration, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06253
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, J. Petrocelli Construction, Inc., John and/or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds, International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Champion Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv05634
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Champion Construction Corp., Herb J. Chan and John or Jane Doe Fiduciary
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund et al v. Waterbury Masonry and Foundation, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01245
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund , Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund , Trustees of the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Waterbury Masonry and Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund et al v. BW Dexter II Inc
as 3:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund , Trustees of the International Masonry Institute , International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers, Local 1 and others
Defendant:
BW Dexter II Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
