Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Williams et al v. Luxury of Queens, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01661
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A., Luxury of Queens, Inc., Michael McGriff and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher King and Norda Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Utility Audit Group et al v. Capital One, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv00097
Defendant:
Jack R. Broesamle, Jr., Capital One, N.A., Designs for Finance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christine O'Kelly, John L. O'Kelly and Utility Audit Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reynolds v. Capital One, N.A.
as 2:2013cv05026
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Capital One, N.A. v. World Luxury Cars, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02837
Plaintiff:
Capital One, N.A.
Defendant:
World Luxury Cars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
AMBAC Assurance Corporation et al v. Capital One, N.A.
as 1:2012cv07937
Plaintiff:
AMBAC Assurance Corporation and The Segregated Account of Ambac Assurance Corporation
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
