Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rojas Cordoba et al v. Premiere Motor Lines et al
as 1:2024cv04936
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Rojas Cordoba, Janny I. Crespo Sarmiento and Janina A. Beltran Lopez
Defendant:
Premiere Motor Lines and Marvin Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Diaz Morales (Orlando Hernandez)
as 24-1891
Defendant:
MAURICIO HERNANDEZ PINEDA, RONALD ENRIQUE SALGUERO PORTILLO, Ronald Salguero and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Beltran Prats v. OKN Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv04067
Defendant:
JOE QUARTARARO and OKN Inc. doing business as Le Jardine Du Roi
Plaintiff:
RUDY BELTRAN PRATS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 FLSA: Definitions
United States of America v. Diaz Morales (Hernandez Pineda)
as 24-1868
Defendant:
JOH, Don Amado, Tony Hernandez and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tola-Beltran v. Garland
as 24-1295
Petitioner:
MIRLA PATRICIA TOLA-BELTRAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Haxhaj (Beltran)
as 24-1135
Defendant:
BORIS BELTRAN, SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, YELTSIN BELTRAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Beltran v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06201
Plaintiff:
Carmen Beltran
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Haxhaj (Ortega)
as 24-731
Defendant:
FRANCISCO ORTEGA, SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, YELTSIN BELTRAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Beltran Marroquin v. Garland
as 24-190
Petitioner:
LUIS FERNANDO BELTRAN MARROQUIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
