Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08405
Plaintiff:
Sheri Adams
Defendant:
Alberto-Culver USA, Inc., Barretts Minerals Inc., BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to MINERAL PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. and as successor-in-interest to WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luke et al v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00181
Defendant:
Avon Products Inc, Brenntag Specialties, Inc. , Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Luke and Jerry Johnson
Cross_claimant:
Conopco Inc. and Revlon Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Revlon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. Fragrance Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv05120
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
Defendant:
Fragrance Acquisitions, LLC , Fragrance Holdings, LLC and Ezriel Polatsek
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
McNamara v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02571
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth McNamara
Defendant:
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. The Merchant of Tennis, Inc.
as 1:2010cv06752
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
Defendant:
The Merchant of Tennis, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaza Packaging Corp. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
as 1:2009cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaza Packaging Corp.
Defendant:
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Oscar de la Renta, Ltd. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
as 1:2008cv05785
Plaintiff:
Oscar DE LA Renta, Ltd., Oscar DE LA Renta, Ltd., Oscar DE LA Renta, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., Elizabeth Arden, Inc. and Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
YSL Beaute, Inc. and YSL Beaute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
