Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Qingdao Zhongfu International Logistics Co., Ltd. v. Hop Wo Intl Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Qingdao Zhongfu International Logistics Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Hop Wo Intl Trading, Inc., Yat Wo Trading Inc., Yao Hua Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Achong et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12144
Plaintiff:
Rona Smith, Richard Nagle, Shquan Mais-Williams and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Li v. Chang Lung Group Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06722
Defendant:
Chang Lung Group Inc. and Tommy Zhou
Plaintiff:
Jian Hua Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Li et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv06392
Plaintiff:
Yan Nan Chen, Yan Qing Chen and Hua Li
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06782
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
