Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00711
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. A & T Engineering, P.C. et al
as 1:2020cv03166
Defendant: Robert H. Lin, Daniel Lin, A & T Engineering, P.C. and others
Plaintiff: chi chen, Rhytham Soni, Shenshen Fan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin et al v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2019cv01757
Plaintiff: Hong Lin and Minghao Lin
Defendant: L Francis Cissna, David L. Roark, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01008
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. New Telecom, Inc. d/b/a Flushing Inn et al
as 1:2017cv04030
Plaintiff: Hong Lin
Defendant: ABC Corp. d/b/a Flushing Inn, Zeming a.k.a "David" Cheng, New Telecom, Inc. d/b/a Flushing Inn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin v. Lynch
as 17-162
Petitioner: Hong Lin, AKA Dong Li
Respondent: Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Solis v. New China Buffet City, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01497
Defendant: Guo Hong Lin, Jai Fei Lin and New China Buffet City, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin v. Holder
as 12-3560
Petitioner: Hong Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 12-2691
Petitioner: Chao Hong Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 12-1758
Petitioner: Hong Lin and Shu Yin Lin, AKA Shu Ying Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?