Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl Removal- Fair Labor Standards Act
Shah v. Ebix, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03229
Defendant:
Ash Sawhney, Darren Joseph, Robin Raina and others
Plaintiff:
Rupal J. Shah and Rupal Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Botakhanova et al v. Apple Commuter Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04296
Plaintiff:
Leila Botakhanova , Yulia Gradobeva and Inga Dolgova
Defendant:
Apple Commuter Inc. , Biren J. Shah , Edison Management Co. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Murray v. Metropolitan Insurance
as 10-1007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Darren Murray, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Martin Gold, Mary A. Devito and others
Respondent:
Robert H. Benmosche, Nonparty Directors and Officers Group, Gerald Clark, Nonparty Directors and Officers Group, Joan Ganz Cooney, Nonparty Directors and Officers Group and others
Movant - Appellant:
Lawrence Kuczynski
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife, Inc.
-AKT Murray v. Metropolitan Ins, et al
as 9:2000cv02258
Respondent:
Curtis H. Barnette, Paulette Beliunas, Robert H. Benmosche and others
Objector:
Thomas Sterrett Bell, Christopher Mueller, John J. Pentz and others
Movant:
Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, Goldman, Sachs & Co., and New York State Insurance Department
Special Master:
Richard J. Davis
Consol Plaintiff:
Mary A. Devito, Michael A. Giannattasio, Martin Gold and others
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Darren F. Murray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00837
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
