Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Big box Store Limited
as 16-3726
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
EPRO E-Commerce Limited, DBA DealExtreme, DBA Dealextreme.com, DBA DX, DBA Dx.com
Defendant:
DEF, Big Box Store Limited, DBA Bigboxstore.com, DBA Bigboxsave.com, Zhongren Cao, DBA United Pacific Connections Company, DBA Atechport.com, DBA Wirelessspycamera.biz and others
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Big box Store Limited, et al
as 16-3637
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant:
DEF, Big Box Store Limited, DBA Bigboxstore.com, DBA Bigboxsave.com, Zhongren Cao, DBA United Pacific Connections Company, DBA Atechport.com, DBA Wirelessspycamera.biz and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
EPRO E-Commerce Limited, DBA DealExtreme, DBA Dealextreme.com, DBA DX, DBA Dx.com
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Big Box Store Limited, et al
as 12-4290
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant:
DEF, Big Box Store Limited, DBA Bigboxstore.com, DBA Bigboxsave.com, Zhongren Cao, DBA United Pacific Connections Company, DBA Atechport.com, DBA Wirelessspycamera.biz and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dealextreme.com
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Big box Store Limited, et al
as 1:2012cv06283
Plaintiff:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Zhongren Cao, D201.com, Dealextreme.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Shenzhen Sosound Technology Co Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv09187
Plaintiff:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Sosound Technology Co Ltd., Focalprice Inc, Hong Xing Industrial Hong Kong Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Klipsch Group, Inc. et al v. M/V CMA CGM ORFEO et al
as 1:2009cv05771
Plaintiff:
Klipsch Group, Inc. and Audio Products International Corp.
Defendant:
M/V CMA CGM ORFEO and Ocean World Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
