Cases 1 - 6 of 6
IN RE COMMITTEE TO STOP AIRPOR
as 16-3226
Petitioner:
Committee to Stop Airport Expansion, Pat Trunzo, Jr. and Pat Trunzo, III
Respondent:
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc., Analar Corporation, Helicopter Association International, Inc and others
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta, FAA Administrator, in his official capacity
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. et al v. Federal Aviation Administration et al
as 9:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Analar Corporation, Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc., Helicopter Association International, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta, FAA Administrator, in his official capacity
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. et al v. Federal Aviation Administration et al
as 2:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Analar Corporation, Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc., Helicopter Association International, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Paskar v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 13-1554
Petitioner:
Kenneth D. Paskar and Friends of LaGuardia Airport, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration, Michael P. Huerta, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation and others
County of Tompkins v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 13-1295
Petitioner:
County of Tompkins, Douglas C. Lewis, Michael C. Atwood and others
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta
Paskar v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 13-1070
Petitioner:
Kenneth D. Paskar and Friends of LaGuardia Airport, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
