Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Buczek v. Keybank, N.A.
as 23-7591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
KEYBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (Key Bank), CHRISTOPHER M. GORMAN, An Officer of Keybank, N.A. and an Individual, DAVID P. CASE, Esq., Fein, Such & Crane, LLP and others
Stevens v. Enable Midstream Partners, LP et al
as 1:2021cv03437
Defendant:
Enable Midstream Partners, LP, Ronnie K. Irani, Peter H. Kind and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Stevens
Meulemans v. Enable Midstream Partners, LP et al
as 1:2021cv03073
Defendant:
Enable Midstream Partners, LP, Peter H. Kind, Enable GP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Meulemans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Forest v. Enable Midstream Partners, LP et al
as 1:2021cv02687
Defendant:
Enable Midstream Partners, LP, Ronnie K. Irani, Peter H. Kind and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Forest
Minevskiy v. Enable Midstream Partners, LP et al
as 1:2021cv02652
Defendant:
Enable Midstream Partners, LP, Ronnie K. Irani, Peter H. Kind and others
Plaintiff:
Alexey Minevskiy
Mendelsohn v. Enable Midstream Partners, LP et al
as 1:2021cv02514
Defendant:
Enable Midstream Partners, LP, Ronnie K. Irani, Peter H. Kind and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Mendelsohn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Buczek v. Pretend Lender-Keybank Nation
as 17-1941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deborah Ann Buczek, The real party of interest Rule 17a-pro, per NY DOS UCC 201405120259837
Defendant - Appellee:
Pretend Lender- Keybank National and Andrew Spong
Defendant:
Fein, Such & Crane, LLP, Craig K. Beideman, Mark K. Broyles and others
Buczek v. Pretend Lender-Keybank National et al
as 1:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Buczek
Defendant:
Pretend Lender-Keybank National , Fein.Such & Crane, LLP, Craig K. Beideman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
