Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chen v. Garland
as 21-6580
Petitioner: QIN CHEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05460
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yang v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01693
Defendant: Sai Ching Chan, Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. d/b/a'He Ping Restaurant' and Sou Qin Chen
Plaintiff: Tian Yi Yang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chan v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01651
Defendant: Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc., d/b/a "He Ping Restaurant",, Tianyi Yang and Sou Qin Chen
Plaintiff: Sai Ching Chan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 5542
Yang v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00815
Defendant: Sai Ching Chan, Sou Qin Chen and Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc.
Plaintiff: Tian Xi Yang
Yang v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00812
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Tian Yi Yang, Sai Ching Chan, Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. and others
Chan v. Yang et al
as 1:2020cv00773
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Tian Yi Yang, Sai Ching Chan, He Ping Restaurant, Inc. and others
Tang et al v Happy Restaurant Inc.
as 1:2019cv07304
Defendant: GUOWEI XIAO, ZHONGYAN HE, Tianming Zheng and others
Plaintiff: YAN HONG YU, FEI GE SHANG, QIU YAN GUO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?