Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cherian v. Manipal Education Americas, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Santosh Cherian
Defendant:
Manipal Education Americas, LLC and American University of Antigua Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lira Camara v. Nitin & Pardeep Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv05390
Defendant:
Kiran Kumari, Mohammed, Santosh Kumari and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Lira Camara
Counter Claimant:
Nitin & Pardeep Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Arora v. HDFC Bank Limited et al
as 1:2020cv04140
Defendant:
Sashidhar Jagdishan, Santosh Haldankar, Aditya Puri and others
Plaintiff:
Ashmi Vig Arora
Arora v. HDFC Bank Limited et al
as 2:2020cv04140
Defendant:
Sashidhar Jagdishan, Santosh Haldankar, Aditya Puri and others
Plaintiff:
Ashmi Vig Arora and Meitav Dash Provident Funds and Pension Ltd.
Ravansari v. Kapoor et al
as 1:2018cv07026
Defendant:
John N. Kapoor, Santosh J. Vetticaden, Patrick Fourteau and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Ravansari
Nominal Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
