Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harter v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03705
Plaintiff:
Shan Harter
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc. and Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harter v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03705
Plaintiff:
Shan Harter
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc. and Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Satco Products, Inc. v. The Regents of the University of California
as 2:2020cv04956
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of California
Plaintiff:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06719
Plaintiff:
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Satco Products, Inc. v. The Regents of the University of California
as 2:2019cv06444
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of California
Plaintiff:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Signify North America Corporation et al v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 2:2019cv06125
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Satco Products, Inc.
as 2:2019cv04951
Plaintiff:
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. and Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Lunera Lighting Inc. v. Maxlite, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03373
Plaintiff:
Lunera Lighting Inc.
Defendant:
Maxlite, Inc., Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Satco Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
