Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anastasios Smalis v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 24-1094
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIOS M. SMALIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Defendant / Appellee:
DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SERVICES and DMC MANAGEMENT LLC
Sergei Kovalev v. Home Depot USA Inc, et al
as 23-1759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA INC, HOME DEPOT INC, HOME DEPOT NO 4112 and others
Louis Coviello v. Berkley Publishing Group, et al
as 17-1885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS COVIELLO
Defendant - Appellee:
BERKLEY PUBLISHING GROUP, PENGUIN GROUP USA INC and MATT BIRKBECK
Lyda Greene v. County of Horry, et al
as 16-1021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYDA ELIZABETH GREENE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF HORRY, HORRY COUNTY LIBRARY, SC, USA and HORRY COUNTY FIRE RESCUE, SC, USA, et, al., sone are out of S.C./off mainland/questionable citizenship
Domenic Tricome v. William Nichola
as 13-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM NICHOLAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT USA and others
Carver Benson, et al v. Giant Food Stores, et al
as 11-1073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARVER BENSON and ANNIE BENSON, Husband and Wife
Defendant - Appellant:
GIANT FOOD STORES, LLC, AHOLD USA INC and GIANT FOODS, LLC
Larry Rader v. Ing Groep NV
as 10-3164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY W. RADER
Defendant - Appellee:
ING GROEP NV, RP, ING USA HOLDING CORPORATION, ING DIRECT BANCORP and others
Larry Rader v. Ing Groep NV
as 10-3071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY W. RADER
Defendant - Appellee:
ING GROEP NV, RP, ING USA HOLDING CORPORATION, RICHARD M. DONALDSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ING DIRECT BANCORP, ING BANK FSB and SHAREBUILDER SECURITIES CORPORATION
Lisa St.Jean v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 08-3308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA ANICK ST.JEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN USA, BICE ST. CROIX, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
