Cases 1 - 8 of 8
K. G., et al v. Owl City, et al
as 24-1175
Plaintiff:
K. G. and B. G.
Defendant:
OWL CITY, ADAM YOUNG, DANIEL JORGENSEN and others
In re: NFL Players Concussion v. n
as 15-2273
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN TURNER, Subclass 2 Representative and SHAWN WOODEN, Subclass1 Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES
Not Party - Appellant:
LIYONGO PATRISE ALEXANDER, CHARLIE ANDERSON, CHARLES E. ARBUCKLE and others
Jacqueline Young v. Wackenhut Corp
as 13-1540
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACQUELINE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellant:
WACKENHUT CORP
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al
as 12-1716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VINCENT LAMB
Third Party - Appellee:
YVONNE S. OSTERWALD
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al
as 12-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Third Party - Appellee:
YVONNE S. OSTERWALD
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al
as 12-1545
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL R. OSTERWALD
Not Party - Appellant:
YVONNE S. OSTERWALD
Cameron Auxer, et al v. Alcoa Inc
as 10-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAMERON B. AUXER, in individual, FIONA HELEN BLAKE, an individual, MARIE PATRICIA CATTACH, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCOA INC
Edwin Naythons v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & You, et al
as 08-2527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN E NAYTHONS, (Retired United States Magistrate Judge) Domiciiary of New Jersey
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDRE L. DENNIS and STRADLEY, RONON, STEVENS & YOUNG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
