Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Shamsidin Ali v. Delaware Department of Correct, et al
as 20-1173
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR RONALD HOLSTERMAN, In their individual and official capa, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE, In their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS and ROBERT SAUNDERS, AKA Shamsidin Ali
Christakis Vrakas, et al v. United States Steel Corp, et al
as 20-8003
Not Yet Classified:
MARIO LONGHI, CHRISTAKIS VRAKAS, DAVID B. BURRITT and others
Tyrone Anderson v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 19-3476
Defendant:
PERRY PHELPS, Department of Corrections Commissioner of Delaware, STEVEN WESLEY, Chief Bureau of Prisons in the State of Delaware, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE WAYNE ANDERSON
Deanna Pierce v. City of Philadelphia
as 19-3017
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANNA PIERCE
David Watson v. Gus Christo, et al
as 19-2737
Defendant / Appellee:
GUS CHRISTO, Chaplain, JAMES SCARBOROUGH, Deputy Warden, MICHAEL KNIGHT, Food Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. WATSON
USA v. Jean McIntosh
as 19-2688
Defendant / Appellant:
JEAN MCINTOSH, a/k/a "SHAY" a/k/a "JEAN PIERCE' a/k/a "LARONDA SMITH"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Deanna Pierce v. City of Philadelphia
as 19-2585
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANNA PIERCE
Paul Fahmy v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 19-2516
Defendant:
LT. BURMAN, RN IRENE FUH, RN ERIC NEBA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. FAHMY
Darrell Law v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-2474
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DANA METZGER, COMMISSIONER PERRY PHELPS and WARDEN DAVID PIERCE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL LAW
Donald Simmons v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-2287
Defendant:
CONNECTION CORRECTIONS HEALTHCARE, WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, DR. MARC D. RICHMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD J. SIMMONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
