Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Michael Nelson v. David Brown, et al
as 19-1473
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID L. BROWN, KENNETH T. LEVINE, JOHN M. CLARK and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. NELSON
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HAMILTON
Michael Nelson v. David Brown, et al
as 19-1496
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID L. BROWN, KENNETH T. LEVINE, JOHN M. CLARK and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. NELSON
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN F. MULLEN and CLAUDIA D. MCCARRON
In re: Marc Stephens, et al
as 19-1447
Undetermined:
DET. SANTIAGO INCLE, JR., NINA C. REMSON, Attorney at Law, LLC, WILLIAM J. MARTINI and others
Claudia Moreno Garcia v. Attorney General United State
as 16-2609
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA MORENO GARCIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claudia Flores-Rios v. Attorney General United State
as 16-1277
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA FLORES-RIOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Claudia Marquez
as 12-2706
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: CLAUDIA LORENA MARQUEZ MORENO
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
CURTIS V. GOMEZ
USA v. Claudia Marquez Moreno
as 12-1460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLAUDIA LORENA MARQUEZ MORENO
In Re: Arthur Baldwin, et al, et al
as 11-4447
Not Party - Respondent:
In re: LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGED
Defendant - Petitioner:
JEROME BULLOCK, ANGELA FORD, JOANNE MARIE ANDIORIO and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGED
In re: Claudia Wiltbank-Johnson
as 11-4219
Petitioner:
In re: CLAUDIA WILTBANK-JOHNSON
Respondent:
LAUREN M. MCEVOY and CHARLES M. OBERLY, III
In re: Claudia Wiltbank-Johnson
as 11-2878
Petitioner:
In re: CLAUDIA WILTBANK-JOHNSON
Respondent:
KATHLEEN BROWN, BENJAMIN WILTBANK, JUANITA WILTBANK and others
Nominal Respondent:
DONALD F. PARSONS, JR., Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
