Cases 11 - 20 of 142
USA v. Maurice Lewis
as 22-2570
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE LEWIS
David WebbIn re: David Webb
as 22-2454
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
STATE OF DELAWARE, MOLLY K. MAGARIK, Secretary of Health & Social Services, RENEE P. BEAMAN, Director of Division State Service Centers and others
USA v. Tevin Lewis
as 22-2190
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TEVIN LEWIS
In re: Lewis Bentley
as 22-1955
Petitioner:
In re: LEWIS E. BENTLEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
David WebbIn re: David Webb
as 22-1708
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Government, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Government, MICHAEL S. PURZYCKI, Mayor and others
Thomas Remick, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 22-8013
Respondent:
THOMAS REMICK, NADIYAH WALKER, JAY DIAZ and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and BLANCHE CARNEY, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Prisons
USA v. John Kramer
as 22-1358
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEWIS KRAMER
Kenneth Lewis v. USA, et al
as 21-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, both personally and officially and others
Defendant:
RACHAEL A. HONIG, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, both personally and officially, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, both personally and officially and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, both personally and officially
Barry Lewis v. Postmaster General of the Unit
as 21-2958
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY B. LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
USA v. Jamar Lewis
as 21-2621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMAR M. LEWIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
